Optimization

Optimization

Although the word “optimization” shares the same root as “optimal,” it is rare for the process of optimization to produce a truly optimal system. The optimized system will typically only be optimal in one application or for one audience. One might reduce the amount of time that a program takes to perform some task at the price of making it consume more memory. In an application where memory space is at a premium, one might deliberately choose a slower algorithm in order to use less memory. Often there is no “one size fits all” design which works well in all cases, so engineers make trade-offs to optimize the attributes of greatest interest. Additionally, the effort required to make a piece of software completely optimal—incapable of any further improvement— is almost always more than is reasonable for the benefits that would be accrued; so the process of optimization may be halted before a completely optimal solution has been reached. Fortunately, it is often the case that the greatest improvements come early in the process.

 

Links:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Program_optimization

http://www.tantalon.com/pete/cppopt/main.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compiler_optimization

Stack

Stack - PUSH/POP

LIFO stack

Stacks are a type of container adaptors, specifically designed to operate in a LIFO context (last-in first-out), where elements are inserted and extracted only from the end of the container.

stacks are implemented as containers adaptors, which are classes that use an encapsulated object of a specific container class as its underlying container, providing a specific set of member functions to access its elements. Elements are pushed/popped from the “back” of the specific container, which is known as the top of the stack.

The underlying container may be any of the standard container class templates or some other specifically designed container class. The only requirement is that it supports the following operations:

• back()
• push_back()
• pop_back()

Link:

http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/stl/stack/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack_(data_structure)

Asserts

 

Assert Safely

 

Expert programmers use the assert() macro to seed their code with debugging statements. So should we all.

The macro must have no effect on the system – it shouldn’t change memory, interrupt state, or I/O, and it should make no function calls. The user must feel free to sprinkle these at will throughout the program. Disabling the asserts in released code must never change the way the program operates.

The macro generally looks something like:

#define
assert(s)
if (s)
{}else (printf("Error at %s %d: ", __FILE__, __LINE__)

It’s sort of an odd way to write code – if the condition is true (in which case assert() takes no action) there’s a null pair of braces. Why not test the negation of the statement “s”?

Links: http://www.ganssle.com/articles/adifasts.htm

Assembly vs. C

Given a particular programming problem, what language should you use to realize the solution? Your choice could very well affect the success or failure of the project. So you’d better choose wisely.

Have you chosen the best programming language for your current embedded project? Your answer may very well depend on how the phrase “best programming language” is defined. Perhaps you’ve chosen the language that produces the most efficient code for your particular processor; or maybe you’ve selected the one that will allow you to finish the coding most quickly or with fewer bugs. Then again, maybe you–like so many of us–are just using the same language you always have.

Even considered within the narrow scope of embedded systems, the decision of what language to use to implement the solution to a given programming problem is a difficult one. Many factors must be considered and different weights given to each of them.

The factors relevant to a language decision probably include at least:

• Efficiency of compiled code
• Source code portability
• Program maintainability
• Typical bug rates (say, per thousand lines of code)
• The amount of time it will take to develop the solution
• The availability and cost of the compilers and other development tools
• Your personal experience (or that of the developers on your team) with specific languages or tools

Links: http://www.netrino.com/Connecting/2000-03/index.php

The ‘C’ test. Part – XVI

Obscure syntax

16. ‘C’ allows some appalling constructs. Is this construct legal, and if so what does this code do?

int a = 5, b = 7, c;
c = a+++b;

This question is intended to be a lighthearted end to the quiz, as, believe it or not, this is perfectly legal syntax. The question is how does the compiler treat it? Those poor compiler writers actually debated this issue, and came up with the “maximum munch” rule, which stipulates that the compiler should bite off as big (and legal) a chunk as it can. Hence, this code is treated as:

c = a++ + b;

Thus, after this code is executed, a = 6, b = 7, and c = 12.

If you knew the answer, or guessed correctly, well done. If you didn’t know the answer then I wouldn’t consider this to be a problem. I find the greatest benefit of this question is that it is good for stimulating questions on coding styles, the value of code reviews, and the benefits of using lint.

Well folks, there you have it. That was my version of the C test. I hope you had as much fun taking it as I had writing it. If you think the test is a good test, then by all means use it in your recruitment. Who knows, I may get lucky in a year or two and end up being on the receiving end of my own work.

 Links:

for “The ‘C’ test. Part – I”  to  “The ‘C’ test. Part – XVI”

http://www.embedded.com/2000/0005/0005feat2.htm

http://www.embedded.com/98/9811/9811fe3.htm